KAREN’S DIARY: “I had to tell my 80-year-old mum her daughter had been sacked from the job she loved”.

karen.jpg

I started the day by signing on.

This was the first time I had done this for 25 years. I must admit I never expected to have to do it again.

It took me 90 minutes in all – it was a fairly dispiriting and humiliating experience. But there was one lighter moment when they did actually ask me if I was engaged in an industrial dispute! The chap apologised for not recognising me after I told him what had happened. There was no box on the form though to tell them that 150 colleagues were out on strike in support of freedom of speech.

Then I made a phone call to a Labour councillor in Manchester who I have known for years. He used to work in mental health and has been an active trade unionist himself.

never-walk-alon.jpg

I asked for his support and his public backing for the campaign.  He told me that he had met with some colleagues last week and they had discussed my case. (I wish they had invited me so I could answer any of their questions!)

After their meeting they had apparently decided to restrict their comments to this:  “Karen is still going through the official process so it is inappropriate for us to make any further comment.” 

I was a bit gobsmacked to say the least. He said that I still had an appeal to go through – if I had a good case, then I would be reinstated!

He did not seem to appreciate or understand that I have already been through seven days of a disciplinary process where absolutely nothing to justify my sacking was produced in evidence against me. I was sacked, simply, on four charges – all of which related to me speaking out about the mental health service in Manchester.

He just did not get it. He didn’t even know the charges which were brought against me: –

  • Bringing the Trust into “disrepute” by being interviewed for a magazine article in which I criticised the transfer of NHS care to the voluntary sector
  • Speaking out and telling people that I had been suspended and exactly why
  • Protesting my innocence publicly (presumably I should have done this privately)
  • “Allowing” the press to print misleading articles about me

 Another charge that  “I may have misused time” was dropped.

My old trade unionst ‘friend’ kept repeating that if i had been accused of “speaking out” then clearly that was not a sackable offence. So I would be OK  “within the process”. No need to worry.

He didn’t seem to realise that because I have been sacked, I now have no money to live on.

He didn’t seem to understand that my wages have been stopped. 

I have had the heartbreaking task of phoning my 80-year-old mother – who was a nurse herself for more than 30 years – to break the news that her daughter has just been sacked from the job she loved.

Suddenly my professional identity has been stolen from me – I am no longer the community psychiatric nurse I have been for the last 25 years.

And I feel I have been forced to abandon my patients – the vulnerable people I have worked with and cared for over the years. 

All of this seemed to come as something of a surprise to him. It was as if it hadn’t really happened.

I could not believe that this man, a Labour councillor and active trade unionist, expected me to put my trust and faith in a system and a “process” that has already failed me once and failed my patients.

This much respected “process” first suspended me because I expressed my views. Then this fantastically fair “process” sacked me on separate charges of speaking out about the state of the mental health service I work in.

How can a “process” that has then gone on to employ private investigators against me, use private HR services and been so unfair in its judgement, be trusted to suddenly become fair?

The councillor then tried to say that he and his colleagues were worried about the state of Manchester’s mental health services, that they were in the worst three per cent of trusts in the UK and that this is what they now most wanted to focus their attention on.

What does he think my campaign is fundamentally all about?

I am very glad that he is now concerned about the state of mental health services in Manchester. But where was he during the last 18 months when staff have been appealing at council meetings and scrutiny committees, lobbying and writing letters. We got no response then.  Perhaps the councillor’s silence encouraged the Trust to think they could suspend and sack anyone who dared to raise their voice about what was happening?

My trust is a joint health and local authority provided service. Councillors therefore cannot avoid some responsibilty for the condition of mental health services in Manchester. It is up to them to try and put it right.

It is clear to anyone who examines this issue for a second, that I have been sacked precisely for speaking out and organising campaigns against the cuts in mental health services. Suddenly some councillors now start to become interested – perhaps that’s their way of avoiding dealing with my case?

As I got angrier, I asked my councillor ‘friend’ who he expected to speak out against cuts next time? Who would want to put themselves in my shoes?

He repeated: “If you have been sacked for speaking out, the ‘process’ will see you right even if that is eventually at an employment tribunal.” (He seemed to accept that I would lose any appeal and that I wouhld have to spend months taking my case to an employment tribunal.)

By this stage I was almost speechless with anger. I could not tell him that the day I was suspended, I got a letter promoting me to the highest nursing grade. So no complaints about my professionalism or dedication. Just that I wasn’t prepared to keep my mouth shut about the state of mental health services. 

Public servants deserve better from a Labour-governed NHS and a Labour-controlled local council. We should not have to wait for justice from the courts! We expect Labour councillors to stand up for the principle of free speech, to protect whistleblowers and to uphold the principles of free trade unionism.

I don’t think I will be the only person who is disappointed with the cowardly fence-sitting of this particular Labour councillor.

But I am not going to keep quiet about the state of the service I care deeply about – and nor, thankfully, are lots of other people.

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under Free speech

8 responses to “KAREN’S DIARY: “I had to tell my 80-year-old mum her daughter had been sacked from the job she loved”.

  1. Labour member

    Karen
    Most of my friends in the Labour Party are totally behind you.
    I don’t know who this councillor is but he is being much too cautious.
    I’ve seen all the letters supporting you in the local papers. It seems to me that backing you will be a vote winner for Manchester Labour.
    I’m sure the councillors and MPs realise this – lets hope the right thing is done at your appeal.
    I still have faith in my party.
    Sorry to be anonymous but I work for a local authority.

  2. Michael

    Karen
    name and shame this Councillor and anybody who comes up with this nonsense…

  3. Michael

    Karen,

    What they have done to you is a travesty. The hospital and the government should be ashamed. I not only hope that you get your job back, I also hope that the conditions you have spoken out about get fixed and the board that gave you the sack get exactly what they deserve, punishment for they’re poor treatment of patient then the sack for sacking you!!!

    Know that many of your colonial cousins “down under” support your actions.

  4. Naomi Stanley

    I can imagine how awful you must feel at this time. I’m worried they may take your pension back as well. I have spoken to other union reps across the Northwest who feel that the Trusts they work for have been impressed by what has happened. There has been an upsurge of criticism and picky behaviour towards reps from line managers over a number of issues- predominantly time off for reps to do their union work. I fully expect the knock-on effects of your case will impact on many stewards as the Trusts now believe they can bully them ito submission. I wrote to you once before saying that an attack on you was an attack on all of us. Incidently, would you be interested in joining a campaign to press Unison into accepting unemployed members as other Unions do? As you can appreciate, they are a valuable resource and many good workers lose their jobs through no fault of their own (myself included).
    I understand your frustration with the councillor- why am I not surprised by what he said? I did believe that the Trust was hell bent on sacking you and nothing would have changed that. However, I also believe that you will win an employment tribunal . Best wishes to you, Naomi Stanley

  5. Stewart Crehan

    Dear Karen
    What has happened to you is outrageous. From what I can see, it shows that the Trust managers have less interest in promoting mental health than in keeping the lid on their own failures by gagging critics. They have embarked on a shameful attack on trade unionism within the NHS as part of their privatisation plans. Unison ought to be backing you to the hilt nationally in defence of union principles, because if the NHS bosses get away with this it will be a major setback for all of us. It will also strengthen the attack on human rights, in this case free speech. They have no evidence that you were not doing your job properly, indeed as we all know you were promoted on the day you were suspended. Acting as a mental health professional with two decades of experience you were publicly defending the interests of the patients.
    We in UCU are fully behind you, and we shall campaign in your support until you are reinstated.
    All the best for your campaign
    Stewart Crehan

  6. vall midson

    I am a long time friend and colleague of karens and one of the staff striking in support of her I know I speak for colleagues and supporters when I say we will fight for Karen’s reinstatement and better services for our service users and carers despite the absolutly cowardly stance taken by our labour councillors.Not a position taken by the liberal councillors who are backing Karen and calling for her reinstatement!Keep fighting Karen we have right on our side and we will win

  7. John Drake

    Dear Karen,
    On behalf of all the FBU members and officials in the South West I offer our support, solidarity and assistance in whatever way we can, this outrageous attack on a trade unionist who is “simply telling it as it is” is unjust, immoral and an attack on all of us that are engaged in the fight against the worse excesses of privatisation and attacks on workers conditions.
    The attempted justification of reducing front line services to save money is one that is being rejected by the majority of public and your victimisation for speaking out is recognised for what it is – institutional bullying of the worst kind –
    Good luck Comrade

  8. I would like to wish you every success in your campaign.

    Last year my sister was diagnosed with depression after she tried twice to overdose. With the help of workers such as yourself, she has improved and came off her medication two weeks.

    Mental Health services are vital to communities and must be funded and staffed properly.

    We need people like to speak to the media when they are not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s